I don’t mean to get all political or anything, but I saw the news today and now it’s bothering me. I don’t watch the news too much, cause I’m just not that interested in current events. Also, I can’t really watch too much political stuff, cause it always makes me angry. But we happen to be having a bit of snow here in the Northeast (they say where I am we might get 2 ft, which is fun) and we had the weather on, which then turned into the news.

The story that made me a little steamed is where Barack Obama’s aide resigned after some remarks she made about Hillary Clinton. First of all, I’m sure we can all agree that her remarks were definitely rude. But why isn’t an apology enough? I mean, did she have to resign? Everyone is entitled to an opinion, and we have the freedom of speech that allows us to express our opinions. Obviously, it’s wrong to be rude to others, but still an opinion is just that, an opinion. It’s just a little name-calling. Isn’t that what happens in politics all the time? Besides how do we know its not true. From what I know about Ms. Clinton, I’d say she is definitely willing to stoop to anything to get what she wants. She was willing to forgive her sleazebag of a lying, cheating husband to keep the power of the White House. I know what you’re saying, don’t judge because you don’t know what you would do in the same position. But I can tell you this, if my husband ever cheated on me with some young chick from his office - in his office - I wouldn’t sit around and suffer the humiliation of everyone finding out about it. One of us would be out of the house so fast, heads would spin. I mean, either he’d be going or I would. I don’t care what it would cost me in power or money or anything else, cause my self-respect is more important and it can’t be replaced. Obviously, Ms. Clinton feels differently and the power was more important than anything else. So, again I say, maybe what that aide said was true. Still rude, but true. So why isn’t an apology good enough? (Did you ever notice that the more liberal people are, the less liberty they tend to allow others?)
The last part of the story was where Ms. Clinton apparently retaliates (cause, obviously, we’re all six-year-olds and when someone calls you a name, you have to call them a name, too, right?) Anyway, she said something about how Obama’s people say one thing and he says another, referring to his stance on the war, and that people won’t know what to believe.
Mr. Obama’s response was that he would end the war in 2009. That’s got to the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard in my life. I don’t know if anyone told Mr. Obama, but you can’t stop a war by just saying so. I’m sure its a lovely thought, but its certainly not honest or practical. He can pull the troops out, but that doesn’t end the war. It is, however, a slap in the face to all those who have sacrificed their lives; it makes their lives and their sacrifice worth nothing. If we don’t accomplish and complete what we started, what was the point of their deaths?
If that’s his plan, then he’s a monster, too.